Entourage Pro · Insights · Sample Report
Loudspeaker Study
Mid-Sized PA Systems
A demonstration of the Entourage Pro Insights deliverable: primary research conducted with verified live-event professionals, cleaned and structured into an interactive dashboard.
This sample explores how FOH engineers, monitor engineers, system techs and production managers specify and select mid-sized PA systems — what drives their decisions, how brands earn or lose preference, and which factors translate to specification when budgets are real.
All figures shown are illustrative. The structure, rigour and methodology mirror live client deliverables.
The respondents
Who participated
Composition of the surveyed audience by role, experience and show volume
Demographics
01 · ROLE
FOH-led
Front-of-house engineers form the largest segment
02 · EXPERIENCE
Senior
Three quarters with 15+ years in the industry
03 · SHOWS / YR
Active
Most respondents work 50+ shows annually
Methodology note. Live Insights studies are fielded to Entourage Pro's verified industry panel of 12,000+ professionals across crew, rental and distribution segments. Responses are deduplicated and verified against role and recent activity. This sample report uses illustrative data to demonstrate report structure, chart treatments and analytical depth — figures shown do not represent any live study.
Headline numbers
Key findings
Three top-line takeaways from the study — full context follows in subsequent tabs
Summary
Sound Quality
94%
Hands-on Influence
91%
Demo Importance
61%
Decision triggers
What drives recommendations and specification
Top considerations and the role of compatibility in system choice
Section 2
Top three considerations when recommending a mid-sized PA system
Importance of compatibility with existing equipment
Does compatibility ever override sound quality or features?
Influence & awareness
How professionals discover and evaluate systems
Information sources, awareness shifts, and the influence of clients and riders
Section 3
Top three factors that most influence decisions
How you first encounter or become aware of new systems
How awareness sources have shifted in the past five years
Influence of client / end-user brand recognition
Do rider or specification requirements influence your specs?
Proportion of projects where clients rely on your recommendation
When clients have no predetermined requirements, what drives your choice?
Current system
Multi-brand strategies, benefits and limitations
Working relationships with preferred systems and what would prompt a switch
Section 4
Do you regularly recommend systems from multiple manufacturers?
Top three benefits of your preferred system
Limitations or compromises with your preferred system
Free-text responses, thematically clustered. Live deliverables include full verbatim transcripts; quotes here are blurred to protect respondent confidentiality in this sample.
Price / cost14 responses
"Price. But you pay for what you get. Weight. But hey there's local crew."
"Constant price hikes."
"The value for money factor is a gap that's closing — competitors improving without the same premium."
"Client budget!!"
Software / prediction tools10 responses
"Not possible to see / adjust frequency response in ArrayCalc — only via array process."
"All software has major room for improvement."
"Have a better prediction and design software."
"Some brands the software is lacking, some it's relied upon too much."
Weight / handling / size8 responses
"Weight of kit."
"The weight of the system, but sometimes there's no room to play with that."
"Size / power, speed to setup."
None / minimal8 responses
"None. Otherwise I wouldn't use it. No system is perfect."
"I generally don't feel in any way limited or compromised."
"Non-critical, minor nuances only."
Training / support / service7 responses
"Lack of local support / service / maintenance of gear."
"Not enough local access and quality deployment options."
"Access to official training and form factor of certain amps."
Other themes7 responses
"Always reliability."
"Change in distribution means B2B supplies are no longer possible."
"Cable patch locks via tie line locks. Update notifications."
Rigging / infrastructure4 responses
"Single pick point calculation inaccuracies."
"Infrastructure is sometimes over-complicated."
"I wish manufacturers would design specific front-of-stage lip fills."
Sound quality / deployment3 responses
"Highly dependent on the SE and/or deployment — properly deployed and it's fantastic every time."
"I would reduce box density, but not at the expense of sonic integrity."
"Sound quality."
Circumstances that would prompt a brand change
Importance of demo access in your evaluation process
Support & service
Manufacturer service experience
Training, communication and the channels professionals trust to stay current
Section 5
Frequency of attending training
Self-rated awareness of manufacturer updates
What would improve manufacturer training
Preferred channels for product updates
Software & tools
Prediction software and design tools
How accompanying software shapes hardware preference
Section 6
Importance of manufacturer software
Frequency of using prediction software
Most valued features in manufacturer software
How software quality affects brand confidence
End of sample
This is an illustrative example. A live Insights deliverable includes verbatim respondent quotes, segmentation by experience and region, brand-by-brand performance scorecards, and an executive summary tailored to the commissioning client.
Commission a study →